A simple membrane makes carbon capture six times more efficient — and cheaper
MIT engineers added a nanoscale filtering membrane to a carbon-capture system, letting its capture and release stages each run at peak efficiency. The result: a sixfold jump in efficiency and costs cut by at least 20%, from roughly $600 to $450 per ton.
InnovationGNGV Editorial Team5 min readLast reviewed September 28, 2026
Capturing carbon dioxide directly from industrial exhaust or the open air is one of the tools the world may need to keep climate change in check — but it has always been stubbornly expensive and energy-hungry. Part of the problem is a built-in conflict: the same liquid that is good at grabbing CO₂ from the air is not good at releasing it again so it can be stored, and forcing one liquid to do both jobs means neither is done well.
MIT engineers found an elegant way around that trade-off, and SciTechDaily reported the advance. Their insight was to insert a nanoscale filtering membrane between the two stages. The membrane sorts ions by their electrical charge — carbonate ions carry a charge of two, hydroxide ions a charge of one — separating them with roughly 95% efficiency. That lets the capture step and the release step each operate in the chemical environment that suits it best, instead of compromising.
The payoff is dramatic. The system boosted efficiency sixfold while cutting costs by at least 20%, bringing the price of capturing a ton of CO₂ down from about $600 to roughly $450. In a field where cost is the single biggest barrier to deployment, shaving off that much is the difference between a technology that stays in the lab and one that companies and governments can actually afford to build at scale.
The work was carried out by a team including doctoral students Simon Rufer, Tal Joseph and Zara Aamer, working with mechanical engineering professor Kripa Varanasi. What makes their approach appealing is its modesty: rather than inventing an exotic new chemistry, they added a well-understood filtering step to an existing process, the kind of practical tweak that is often easier to adopt than a radical redesign.
Carbon capture is not a substitute for cutting emissions at the source, and no single membrane will solve climate change. But bending the cost curve downward matters enormously, because the cheaper it becomes to pull CO₂ out of smokestacks and skies, the more of it we can realistically remove. This is engineering in service of a livable planet — patient, incremental and, if it scales, genuinely hopeful.
